Walk into the wilds with your camping gear on your back,
pitch your tent, sleep, pack your tent, move on. What are you doing? Backpacking,
wild camping, or something else? The name shouldn’t really matter, it’s the
activity that counts. The name is just a convenient label, shorthand to describe
what you do quickly so others understand. The name becomes a symbol of identity
too. It joins you to a tribe. With others using this name you can make assumptions,
share experiences, use words that may mean nothing to those outside the group.
In the last few decades wild camping has become a common
description to describe those of us who camp in the hills, in wild places,
having carried everything in on our backs. Much more recently wild camping has
been used by the mass media to describe roadside camping outwith campsites,
sometime not even in tents but in campervans. In particular it’s used to
describe those who leave litter including discarded tents and other gear, light
fires, hack branches off trees and generally cause mess and damage.
Unsurprisingly there have been strong objections to this
recent use of wild camping. People don’t want their style of wild camping with
its philosophy of leave no trace sullied by association with campers who leave
a mess. People are concerned too that if wild camping gets a bad reputation in
general then there may be restrictions placed upon it that will affect everyone.
To address these concerns there have been suggestions for a
name change for wild camping or a new name for those causing problems. For wild
camping ‘bivouacking’, ‘lightweight camping’ and ‘leave no trace camping’ have
been suggested. I don’t think these will catch on. In the UK the first usually
means sleeping out without a tent (in some countries it does include using a
tent, as long as it’s not tall enough to stand up in). The other two are not, I
think, specific enough. Wild camping is, I suspect, here to stay. The mass
media is slow to change. As to changing the name for the campers who leave a
mess all the ones I’ve seen are pejorative – ‘dirty campers’ and similar. I don’t
think this would be helpful. There are likely to be many of these campers who
simply don’t know what they should be doing. Education and help can achieve
changes in behaviour. Insults are unlikely to do this.

For myself, I’d be quite happy to go back to backpacking to
describe the activity. When I started out in the early 1970s there wasn’t a
word in the UK for it. I went fellwalking and camping. Then the word
backpacking was imported from the USA, where it was used to distinguish those who
carried all their gear on their backs from those who used pack animals. The
first books I bought on the subject all had backpacking or backpacker in the
title. The Backpacker’s Club was formed and there were backpacking columns in
camping magazines (there were no walking magazines). I had a name and a tribe.
That continued through the 1980s and early 90s. My first three books all had
backpacking or backpacker in their titles.
Then the mass media began to use the word to mean “a form of
low-cost, independent travel, often staying in inexpensive lodgings and
carrying all necessary possessions in a backpack” (Wikipedia definition) and I
had to get used to being misunderstood when I used the word outside outdoor
circles, except in the USA where it still meant the same. Around the same time ‘wild
camping’ came into being, to describe what backpacking used to mean. And now ‘wild
camping’ is changing meaning too. Damned awkward thing language. It just won’t
stay still.

Backpacking in its original meaning has been subdivided by
proponents into traditional, lightweight, and ultralight backpacking. All these
refer to the weight of equipment carried. The activity remains the same. I
wrote about these labels
here.
Then there is thru-hiking, which means backpacking a multi-day route, usually a
trail, to distinguish it from weekend backpacking. It’s also a relatively new description
and didn’t exist when I began hiking long-distances. I was a thru-hiker before
the term existed!
Possible alternatives to wild camping could be borrowed from North America just as backpacking was. Frontcountry camping and backcountry camping make sense. Backcountry has been taken up by ski tourers here to distinguish themselves from resort skiers. Perhaps wild camping could become backcountry camping and roadside camping frontcountry camping. Perhaps.

Whatever the name good practice, which means minimum impact camping,
is essential and I think all of us who go out and camp in wild places should
not only do this but should show we do it, both to set an example and to let
those who might want to restrict our activity know that the majority of us are
responsible.