 |
The wild north side of Liathach. A mast is proposed for this area.
|
The latest threat to our mountains comes from communication
masts, many of which are planned for remote areas in the Scottish hills where
there are no communities or houses for them to service, just wild land to sully
and spoil.
Why does this crazy scheme exist? Why is time and money being
spent to build masts where they will benefit nobody?
The reason is that the UK government has a set a target to
bring 4G mobile network coverage to 95% of the geographical UK. Not 95% of
people, 95% of land, even if there are no people there.
As concerns for the effects of this on our wild land grow a
coalition of Mountaineering Scotland, the John Muir Trust and the Knoydart
Foundation has written to Ofcom Scotland and the UK Government’s Minister for
Data and Digital Infrastructure. The coalition asks anyone concerned to write
to the Minister too. (Sir John
Whittingdale – john.whittingdale.mp@parliament.uk).
There is more information about the coalition and its campaign on the Mountaineering
Scotland website and on the John Muir Trust website.
I think it’s also worthwhile writing to MPs for the areas
concerned whether you are their constituent or not, but especially if one is
your MP (MPs not MSPs as this is a UK scheme, not one devolved to Scotland). My
MP is Drew Hendry, MP for inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey. He will be
getting a letter!
The coalition members make it clear that they support
digital connectivity for people and communities but for that the masts needs to
be in the right places. David Black, Mountaineering Scotland’s Access and
Conservation Officer, says “We want to ensure digital connectivity is achieved
while protecting Scotland’s last wild landscapes”. Mike Daniels, Head of Policy
at the John Muir Trust, says “We want 100% digital connectivity for people and
communities in rural Scotland, rather than 95% coverage on a map. That is why
we are asking the UK Government, Ofcom and the operators to prioritise
proposals where the mast signal would provide coverage and associated
connectivity benefits for rural residents’ homes and business premises, and
gaps along the road network.”
Nick Kempe and George Allan have looked at many of the
proposals and reveal just how intrusive they will be in a series of posts on Parkswatch
Scotland.
In two posts they give details of specific schemes which really
show how bad and ill-thought-out they are. The
first is in the heart of Torridon, in the remote area between Liathach and
Beinn Dearg. This is National Trust for Scotland land and also a National
Scenic Area and a Wild Land Area. The magnificent walk round the back of
Liathach goes right past the proposed site. A mast here is completely inappropriate
and unacceptable. It would not serve any local people.
 |
Luibeg Bridge
|
The second scheme is in the Cairngorms by the
Luibeg
Bridge in the area between the Lairig Ghru and Glen Derry. This is deep in
the hills and again would not serve anybody. Thankfully it has been called in
by the Cairngorms National Park Authority.
In these cases the authors suggest objecting to the plans and
give details how to do so. However whilst it doesn’t take long to do so there
are so many other mast applications it could take a while to cover them all. What’s
needed is an organised campaign against the proposals in general. The coalition
mentioned above is a start but other organisations like the National Trust for
Scotland need to be involved and there needs to be far more publicity (hence
this post). We need to shout about this on social media and in emails and
letters to MPs and the Minister.